<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><SDOCTA xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" STATUS="DEF1" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="TA.xsd"><IDENT><STRING BOLD="on">P10_TA(2025)0046</STRING></IDENT><TI><STRING BOLD="on">Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency</STRING></TI><HIDDEN><STRING HIDDEN="on" ITALIC="on">(A10-0019/2025 - Rapporteur: Dimitris Tsiodras)</STRING></HIDDEN><TXTLST><DECISION><TI><STRING BOLD="on">Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 1 April 2025 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency (COM(2023)0781 – C9-0448/2023 – 2023/0454(COD))</STRING><FOOTNOTE><FIELD> The matter was referred back for interinstitutional negotiations to the committee responsible, pursuant to Rule 60(4), fourth subparagraph (A10-0019/2025).</FIELD></FOOTNOTE></TI><NOTE>(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)</NOTE><TEXT><DISPOSITIF><ACTLST><ACTION/></ACTLST></DISPOSITIF><AMDLST><HD><HEAD.OLD><STRING ITALIC="on">Text proposed by the Commission</STRING></HEAD.OLD><HEAD.NEW><STRING ITALIC="on">Amendment</STRING></HEAD.NEW></HD><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		1</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Recital 1</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P><NO.P>(1)</NO.P>The Commission has, in its Communication ‘European Green Deal’<STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">2</STRING> , set an objective that chemical safety assessments should move towards a process of ‘one-substance, one-assessment’, calling for more transparent and simpler risk assessment processes in order to reduce the burden on all stakeholders, accelerate decision-making, as well as to increase consistency and predictability of scientific decisions and opinions. The Commission, in its Communication on Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability<STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">3</STRING> concludes that, in order to achieve that objective, part of the scientific and technical work on chemicals performed at Union level in support of Union legislation needs to be reattributed to the most suitable Union agencies. This would simplify the current set-up, improve quality and coherence of safety assessments across Union legislation, and ensure more efficient use of existing resources.</P></OLD><NEW><P><NO.P>(1)</NO.P>The Commission has, in its Communication ‘European Green Deal<STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">2</STRING> , set an objective that chemical safety assessments should move towards a process of ‘one-substance, one-assessment’, calling for more transparent and simpler risk assessment processes in order to reduce the burden on all stakeholders, accelerate decision-making, as well as to increase consistency and predictability of scientific decisions and opinions. The Commission, in its Communication on Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability<STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">3</STRING> concludes that, in order to achieve that objective, part of the scientific and technical work on chemicals performed at Union level in support of Union legislation needs to be reattributed to the most suitable Union agencies. This would simplify the current set-up, improve quality and coherence of safety assessments across Union legislation, and ensure more efficient use of existing resources. <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">This approach is also expected to promote cost-effectiveness and competitiveness by simplifying regulatory procedures and reducing administrative burdens, ensuring that businesses can adapt efficiently to evolving regulatory frameworks.</STRING></STRING></P></NEW><OLD><P>__________________</P></OLD><NEW><P>__________________</P></NEW><OLD><P><STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">2</STRING> Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The European Green Deal (COM (2019) 640 final of 11 December 2019).</P></OLD><NEW><P><STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">2</STRING> Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The European Green Deal (COM (2019) 640 final of 11 December 2019).</P></NEW><OLD><P><STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">3</STRING> Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment (COM (2020) 667 final of 14 October 2020).</P></OLD><NEW><P><STRING SUPERSCRIPT="on">3</STRING> Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment (COM (2020) 667 final of 14 October 2020).</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		2</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Recital 2</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P><NO.P>(2)</NO.P>The reattribution of certain scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency is necessary in order to align processes and levels of scientific scrutiny and digitalisation with current standards and processes of the European Chemicals Agency. This is also necessary in order to ensure a consistent standard of scientific quality, transparency, data searchability and interoperability, in line with the ‘one-substance, one-assessment’ ambition.</P></OLD><NEW><P><NO.P>(2)</NO.P>The reattribution of certain scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals Agency is necessary in order to align processes and levels of scientific scrutiny and digitalisation with current standards and processes of the European Chemicals Agency. This is also necessary in order to ensure a consistent standard of scientific quality, transparency, data searchability and interoperability, in line with the ‘one-substance, one-assessment’ ambition. <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">Moreover, digitalisation and streamlined processes will reduce duplicative efforts and administrative delays, providing significant cost savings and efficiency gains for both Member States and economic operators.</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		3</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Recital 6 a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(6a)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">The list of restricted substances referred to in Directive 2011/65/EU should be periodically reviewed to ensure a high level of protection of human health, the environment and consumer safety. It is appropriate to set a review period of at least 36 months, taking into account market developments and technical and scientific progress, and  the fact that restriction dossiers can be submitted by Member States at any time and horizontal restriction measures can be initiated and adopted under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 or other Union law concerning sustainability criteria for hazardous substances and chemicals.</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		4</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Recital 8</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P><NO.P>(8)</NO.P>For amending procedural provisions under Directive 2011/65/EU, a transitional period of <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">12</STRING></STRING> months is necessary to allow for appropriate resource and task allocation for the European Chemicals Agency. That timeframe is considered sufficient to allow potential applicants or Member States to adjust to the modified procedural steps under that Directive.</P></OLD><NEW><P><NO.P>(8)</NO.P>For amending procedural provisions under Directive 2011/65/EU, a transitional period of <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">18</STRING></STRING> months is necessary to allow for appropriate resource and task allocation for the European Chemicals Agency. That timeframe is considered sufficient to allow potential applicants or Member States to adjust to the modified procedural steps under that Directive.</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		5</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P>Where the applicant does not complete the application with the missing elements identified by the Agency in compliance with Annex V within the deadline provided in accordance with the first subparagraph, point (c), the Agency <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">may</STRING></STRING> reject such application. The Agency shall establish and communicate to the applicant without undue delay the date when the application is considered complete.</P></OLD><NEW><P>Where the applicant does not complete the application with the missing elements identified by the Agency in compliance with Annex V within the deadline provided in accordance with the first subparagraph, point (c), the Agency <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">shall</STRING></STRING> reject such application. The Agency shall establish and communicate to the applicant without undue delay the date when the application is considered complete.</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		6</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 5 – paragraph 4a – subparagraph 5</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P>The Agency shall identify which parts of its opinions and of any attachments thereto should be made publicly available on its website and shall make those parts publicly available on its website.</P></OLD><NEW><P>The Agency shall identify which parts of its opinions and of any attachments thereto should be made publicly available on its website and shall make those parts publicly available on its website<STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">, including any requests made in accordance with point (c) of the second subparagraph</STRING></STRING>.</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		7</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 5 – paragraph 5</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(ba)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:</STRING></STRING></P></NEW><OLD><P><NO.P>5.</NO.P>An application for renewal of an exemption shall be made no later than 18 months before the exemption expires. The existing exemption shall remain valid until a decision on the renewal application is taken by the Commission.</P></OLD><NEW><P>"5. An application for renewal of an exemption shall be made no later than 18 months before the exemption expires. The <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">Commission shall adopt the decision on the application within six months of receipt of the opinions from the Agency. The</STRING></STRING> existing exemption shall remain valid until a decision on the renewal application is taken by the Commission.<STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">"</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		8</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P>With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 1 and taking account of the precautionary principle, a review, based on a thorough assessment, and an amendment of the list of restricted substances in Annex II shall be considered by the Commission periodically on its own initiative or following the submission of a restriction dossier prepared by a Member State containing the information referred to in paragraph 2.;</P></OLD><NEW><P>With a view to achieving the objectives set out in Article 1 and taking account of the precautionary principle, a review, based on a thorough assessment, and an amendment of the list of restricted substances in Annex II shall be considered by the Commission periodically <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">and at least every 36 months</STRING></STRING> on its own initiative or following the submission of a restriction dossier prepared by a Member State containing the information referred to in paragraph 2.;</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		9</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P>The review and amendment of the list of restricted substances in Annex II shall be based on restriction dossiers prepared by the Agency at the request of the Commission or prepared by a Member State.</P></OLD><NEW><P>The review and amendment of the list of restricted substances<STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">, or a group of substances,</STRING></STRING> in Annex II shall be based on restriction dossiers prepared by the Agency at the request of the Commission or prepared by a Member State.</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		10</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P>The Agency or a Member State shall take into account any available information and any relevant <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">risk</STRING></STRING> assessment submitted for the purposes of other Union legislation covering the life cycle of the substance used in EEE, in particular the waste phase. To this end, other bodies established under Union law and carrying out a similar task shall, on request, provide information to the Agency or Member State concerned.</P></OLD><NEW><P>The Agency or a Member State shall take into account any available information and any relevant assessment submitted for the purposes of other Union legislation covering <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">any part of</STRING></STRING> the life cycle of the substance used in EEE, in particular the waste phase. To this end, other bodies established under Union law and carrying out a similar task shall, on request, provide information to the Agency or Member State concerned.</P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		11</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point -a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(-a)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">the identity of the substance;</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		12</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point -a a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(-aa)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">a precise and clear wording for the entry of the proposed restriction in Annex II;</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		13</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point -a b (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(-ab)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">references and scientific evidence for the restriction;</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		14</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(ba)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">information on possible alternatives, their availability and suitability;</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		15</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b b (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(bb)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">justification for considering a Union-wide restriction as the most appropriate measure.</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		16</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point b c (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(bc)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">a socio-economic assessment.</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		17</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 20 – paragraph 1 a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(4a)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">In Article 20, the following paragraph is inserted:</STRING></STRING></P></NEW><OLD/><NEW><P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">“1a.	Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making.”</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		18</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Directive 2011/65/EU</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 24 – paragraph 2 a (new)</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD/><NEW><P><NO.P>(4b)</NO.P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">In Article 24 , the following paragraph is added:</STRING></STRING></P></NEW><OLD/><NEW><P><STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">“2a.	The Commission shall monitor the situation regarding the resources of the European Chemicals Agency and the tasks, workload and remit of the scientific committees of the European Chemicals Agency and present, where necessary, a legislative proposal to reflect any needs of the European Chemicals Agency stemming from tasks introduced by this Regulation and to improve the governance of its scientific committees. "</STRING></STRING></P></NEW></AMEND><AMEND><TI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Amendment		19</STRING></TI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Proposal for a directive</STRING></STI.AMD><STI.AMD><STRING BOLD="on">Article 2 – paragraph 1</STRING></STI.AMD><OLD><P>The provisions under this Directive shall be applicable from [OJ: <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">12</STRING></STRING> months after the publication of this Directive].</P></OLD><NEW><P>The provisions under this Directive shall be applicable from [OJ: <STRING BOLD="on"><STRING ITALIC="on">18</STRING></STRING> months after the publication of this Directive].</P></NEW></AMEND></AMDLST></TEXT></DECISION></TXTLST></SDOCTA>